<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Man Sees It clearly</title>
	<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/</link>
	<description>a blog about absolutely nothing.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: mexican drugs pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-3180</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-3180</guid>
					<description>mexican modafinil pharmacy &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.voy.com/214973&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;prescription pharmacy mexican&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mexican modafinil pharmacy <a href="http://www.voy.com/214973" rel="nofollow">prescription pharmacy mexican</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bulldawgy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-94</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-94</guid>
					<description>May our children not grow up to be over-feminized, politically correct tubs of societal goo.  God forbid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May our children not grow up to be over-feminized, politically correct tubs of societal goo.  God forbid.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hughbiquitous : The Churchillian Newt Gingrich</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-93</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-93</guid>
					<description>[...] HT: John Lee [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] HT: John Lee [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pdiddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-92</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 10:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-92</guid>
					<description>Sorry for being such a downer-but that's my take on our nation.  The one problem I see with your example, Hugh, is that we are a different nation now than we were either in the late 30's or throughout the 50's.  Tom Brokaw even wrote a book about that generation, called the &quot;Greatest Generation.&quot;  What we have now as our leading generation is in no way like those from the 30's or the 50's.  That's the main difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for being such a downer-but that&#8217;s my take on our nation.  The one problem I see with your example, Hugh, is that we are a different nation now than we were either in the late 30&#8217;s or throughout the 50&#8217;s.  Tom Brokaw even wrote a book about that generation, called the &#8220;Greatest Generation.&#8221;  What we have now as our leading generation is in no way like those from the 30&#8217;s or the 50&#8217;s.  That&#8217;s the main difference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-91</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-91</guid>
					<description>When Pearl Harbor got bombed, a nation mired in a financial depression became known as a sleeping giant. The giant awoke, took care of business, and went back to sleep.

When the Soviets had us at the end of an ICBM (give or take several thousand), a nation that was losing its resolve turned to a washed-up actor for deliverance. The actor took the stage, told the Soviets what to do, and they did it. Then other actors rose up and told us that the first actor was bad, and we listened to them.

When planes took down the World Trade Center and wrought terror across the country, a nation sitting atop a bursting economic bubble looked to a man derided as an &quot;amiable dunce&quot; to reassert America's interests throughout the world. More actors showed up and undermined his doctrine, so that even the author of the doctrine seems to have lost much of his resolve.

I see a pattern.

The nation goes downhill. Something bad happens. The nation gets its act together. Conditions improve. The nation slides back into its old ways. Something else bad happens.

Sounds as much like the divided kingdoms of Israel as it does the U. S. of A.

So yeah, if and when the nuke goes off, we'll do better for a while. Then we'll slide back. And so the pattern will continue, over and over, until the final Kingdom is established. Amen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Pearl Harbor got bombed, a nation mired in a financial depression became known as a sleeping giant. The giant awoke, took care of business, and went back to sleep.</p>
<p>When the Soviets had us at the end of an ICBM (give or take several thousand), a nation that was losing its resolve turned to a washed-up actor for deliverance. The actor took the stage, told the Soviets what to do, and they did it. Then other actors rose up and told us that the first actor was bad, and we listened to them.</p>
<p>When planes took down the World Trade Center and wrought terror across the country, a nation sitting atop a bursting economic bubble looked to a man derided as an &#8220;amiable dunce&#8221; to reassert America&#8217;s interests throughout the world. More actors showed up and undermined his doctrine, so that even the author of the doctrine seems to have lost much of his resolve.</p>
<p>I see a pattern.</p>
<p>The nation goes downhill. Something bad happens. The nation gets its act together. Conditions improve. The nation slides back into its old ways. Something else bad happens.</p>
<p>Sounds as much like the divided kingdoms of Israel as it does the U. S. of A.</p>
<p>So yeah, if and when the nuke goes off, we&#8217;ll do better for a while. Then we&#8217;ll slide back. And so the pattern will continue, over and over, until the final Kingdom is established. Amen.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bulldawgy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-90</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-90</guid>
					<description>Yowzers!  PDIDDY is really being a downer today. 

I figure, if after the eventual nuclear strike on our nation (I agree with Hugh, it's not a matter of if, but when) our resolve wanes, then I say:

We deserve what we get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yowzers!  PDIDDY is really being a downer today. </p>
<p>I figure, if after the eventual nuclear strike on our nation (I agree with Hugh, it&#8217;s not a matter of if, but when) our resolve wanes, then I say:</p>
<p>We deserve what we get.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pdiddy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-89</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-89</guid>
					<description>Yeah, well when a nuke goes off, it all changes. But here is the problem.  Even after that, our fortitude will wane (just like after 9/11).  It may take three or four years, but the civilian casualties of our enemy, the costs to us-both in terms of lives lost and money spent, and the political hay that can be made from whichever side isn't in power will eventually lead us, even after a nuke hits us, to quit!  We are a nation of expediency and short-term will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, well when a nuke goes off, it all changes. But here is the problem.  Even after that, our fortitude will wane (just like after 9/11).  It may take three or four years, but the civilian casualties of our enemy, the costs to us-both in terms of lives lost and money spent, and the political hay that can be made from whichever side isn&#8217;t in power will eventually lead us, even after a nuke hits us, to quit!  We are a nation of expediency and short-term will.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-88</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-88</guid>
					<description>Also...

&quot;It will never happen,&quot; PDiddy? When somebody ultimately succeeds in nuking one of our cities (and let's face it, it's only a matter of time... as in, &lt;strong&gt;when&lt;/strong&gt;, not if), I think Congress will start singing a different tune.

It happened in Britain under Churchill. It might well happen here, and I see a lot of similarities between the Speaker and Sir Winston.

Except Sir Winston had better one-liners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;It will never happen,&#8221; PDiddy? When somebody ultimately succeeds in nuking one of our cities (and let&#8217;s face it, it&#8217;s only a matter of time&#8230; as in, <strong>when</strong>, not if), I think Congress will start singing a different tune.</p>
<p>It happened in Britain under Churchill. It might well happen here, and I see a lot of similarities between the Speaker and Sir Winston.</p>
<p>Except Sir Winston had better one-liners.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-87</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 17:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-87</guid>
					<description>Metrics-based = &quot;measurable results-based.&quot;

In other words, government agencies that fail will not be allowed to continue to fail.

The bureaucracy we have now basically says, &quot;Awww, you failed. We probably didn't give you enough money... oh, shucks, here's some more. Now do better next time!&quot;

Under a metrics-based system, this would change to &quot;You failed. You are the weakest link. Goodbye. Next!&quot;

I hate to say it, but it's kind of George Steinbrenner-like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metrics-based = &#8220;measurable results-based.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, government agencies that fail will not be allowed to continue to fail.</p>
<p>The bureaucracy we have now basically says, &#8220;Awww, you failed. We probably didn&#8217;t give you enough money&#8230; oh, shucks, here&#8217;s some more. Now do better next time!&#8221;</p>
<p>Under a metrics-based system, this would change to &#8220;You failed. You are the weakest link. Goodbye. Next!&#8221;</p>
<p>I hate to say it, but it&#8217;s kind of George Steinbrenner-like.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CACAMAN</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-86</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 04:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2006/09/11/this-man-sees-it-clearly/#comment-86</guid>
					<description>Gotta keep them from getting nukes starting with Iran.  That is one huge difference between then and now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta keep them from getting nukes starting with Iran.  That is one huge difference between then and now.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
