<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How &#8216;Bout Them Dawgs!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/</link>
	<description>poorly written drivel about absolutely nothing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 22:43:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1 for 2. But considering that I had 365 days.... &#8212; Bulldawgy</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2795</link>
		<dc:creator>1 for 2. But considering that I had 365 days.... &#8212; Bulldawgy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 07:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2795</guid>
		<description>[...] Well - I whiffed this one. Swing and a miss. The sad thing is, I never really got to the point of starting on this one. There was always something that seemed more important. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well &#8211; I whiffed this one. Swing and a miss. The sad thing is, I never really got to the point of starting on this one. There was always something that seemed more important. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2655</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2655</guid>
		<description>Congrats there Mr. Lee. That was quite an impressive win. It was interesting to see Richt discover a running game and pound the Gators into submission.

Frankly the score wasn&#039;t indicative of how bad Georgia whipped Florida.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats there Mr. Lee. That was quite an impressive win. It was interesting to see Richt discover a running game and pound the Gators into submission.</p>
<p>Frankly the score wasn&#8217;t indicative of how bad Georgia whipped Florida.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guiroo</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2653</link>
		<dc:creator>guiroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2653</guid>
		<description>Hey cool link to the article from 1980.  It just so happens that Mr. Jarrett just dug up a commemorative 1980 Championship Coke bottle for me.

The girls and I fired up the old network broadcast pixel monster to sit down and actually watch the spectacle — with popcorn and all.

I think not choking is the only to put it — :uga: actually played a WHOLE game. There was a little lull in the 3rd but they got over it and started making plays again.

It was impressive to watch UFL play though ... they consistently make the big plays — except for the one where they went for the 2 points of course.

In my non-professional opinion, I think that is what is disappointing with :uga: sometimes — when minimal but yet crucial 10 and 15 yard passes are not completed.

GO DAWGS!

P.S. I taught the girls that the spelling and pronunciation is different when you refer to the team ... not D-O-G-S, but D-A-W-G-S. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey cool link to the article from 1980.  It just so happens that Mr. Jarrett just dug up a commemorative 1980 Championship Coke bottle for me.</p>
<p>The girls and I fired up the old network broadcast pixel monster to sit down and actually watch the spectacle — with popcorn and all.</p>
<p>I think not choking is the only to put it — <img src="http://www.bulldawgy.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-uga-smiley/icon_uga.gif" alt="UGA" title="UGA Rocks!" /> actually played a WHOLE game. There was a little lull in the 3rd but they got over it and started making plays again.</p>
<p>It was impressive to watch UFL play though &#8230; they consistently make the big plays — except for the one where they went for the 2 points of course.</p>
<p>In my non-professional opinion, I think that is what is disappointing with <img src="http://www.bulldawgy.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-uga-smiley/icon_uga.gif" alt="UGA" title="UGA Rocks!" /> sometimes — when minimal but yet crucial 10 and 15 yard passes are not completed.</p>
<p>GO DAWGS!</p>
<p>P.S. I taught the girls that the spelling and pronunciation is different when you refer to the team &#8230; not D-O-G-S, but D-A-W-G-S. <img src='http://www.bulldawgy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey J. Stables</title>
		<link>http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2652</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey J. Stables</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 05:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bulldawgy.com/2007/10/27/how-bout-them-dawgs/#comment-2652</guid>
		<description>I must say, that was a good game.  I was definitely rooting for the Bulldogs against Florida.  That 84-yarder for the second touchdown was especially tasty.  Looks like Stafford is settling in...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, that was a good game.  I was definitely rooting for the Bulldogs against Florida.  That 84-yarder for the second touchdown was especially tasty.  Looks like Stafford is settling in&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

